Friday, November 30, 2007

Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership - StopSPP.com

The Other Side of the Story

No sooner had the Security and Prosperity Partnership been launched than the U.S. Commerce Department made space available in its offices for the personnel of 20 “working groups” to carry out the designs of the new organization. Of note is the fact that no one in Congress had been apprised of this development. Why bypass Congress if there’s nothing to hide?

In September 2006, high-level government officials, media heavyweights and corporate leaders met behind closed doors at a plush resort in Banff, Canada. At their gathering, labeled the “North American Forum,” they discussed energy, security, border infrastructure, and North American “integration.” We know about the secret meeting because a Canadian who attended the affair and didn’t like what he heard blew the whistle and shared some of its documents. After the three-day session, attendee Thomas Shannon (a U.S. Assistant Secretary of State) told an audience in Canada, “The North American Forum is a parallel structure to the Security and Prosperity Partnership.” Other U.S. attendees included former Secretary of State George Shultz, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (replaced at the last minute by Joint Chiefs Chairman General Peter Pace), former U.S. Trade Representative and NAFTA co-author Carla Hills, Wall Street Journal columnist Mary Anastasia O’Grady (who has yet to mention the meeting in her column), and several other former cabinet officers and government officials. Counterparts from Canada and Mexico represented their countries. If nothing sinister was going on at this gathering, why was it conducted in secrecy?

As far back as 2002, Mexico’s Vicente Fox called for the establishment of a duplicate of “the European Union” for the entire Western Hemisphere. He is not alone in desiring such a momentous step. British researchers Christopher Booker and Richard North wrote in their 2003 book, The Great Deception: The Secret History of the European Union, about the false promises and incremental steps that have led to what they termed “the most spectacular coup d’etat in history.” Just as the people of Europe were led astray, we in America are facing similar deceitful beginnings leading to a similar “coup d’etat.”

At the August 2007 meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, hundreds of helmeted, armed, and tear-gas-wielding soldiers and police guarded the site, the Montebello Resort in Western Quebec, to assure that the public would not have access to the proceedings. U.S. Ambassador to Canada David Wilkins assured the world in the Canadian press that “no one involved in these discussions is interested in, or has ever proposed, a North American Union, a North American Superhighway, or a North American currency.” But Robert Pastor, who is the originator and purveyor of these very topics, was at the Montebello SPP gathering.

More evidence can be assembled for any Doubting Thomases. But space limitations must be honored. Suffice it to say that the border hasn’t been secured, as journalist Jerome Corsi has indicated, because there’s no intention to secure it. A single political and economic entity known as the North American Union doesn’t allow for individual national border security. But a merger of the three nations requires a common security perimeter that ignores national boundaries. Which is why a growing number of Congressmen, alerted by the “conspiracy theorists,” have co-sponsored legislation to block the NAU and scuttle all aspects of the entire plot.

Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership - StopSPP.com

The Other Side of the Story

Bennett gave some hard facts in his article in the Boston Globe but the other side of the story needs to be told as well.  The quote above gives some of that background.  I'd recommend that you go to the link and follow more of the argument.

The amero conspiracy - The Boston Globe

 

The North American Union is a supranational organization, modeled on the European Union, that will soon fuse Canada, the United States, and Mexico into a single economic and political unit. The details are still being worked out by the countries' leaders, but the NAU's central governing body will have the power to nullify the laws of its member states. Goods and people will flow among the three countries unimpeded, aided by a network of continent-girdling superhighways. The US and Canadian dollars, along with the peso, will be phased out and replaced by a common North American currency called the amero.

If you haven't heard about the NAU, that may be because its plotters have succeeded in keeping it secret. Or, more likely, because there is no such thing. Government officials say a continental union is out of the question, and economists and political analysts overwhelmingly agree that there will not be a North American Union in our lifetimes. But belief in the NAU - that the plans are very real, and that the nation is poised to lose its independence - has been spreading from its origins in the conservative fringe, coloring political press conferences and candidate question-and-answer sessions, and reaching a kind of critical mass on the campaign trail. Republican presidential candidate and Texas congressman Ron Paul has made the North American Union one of his central issues.

The amero conspiracy - The Boston Globe

This is a good summary of the various issues in the North American Union discussion.  The potential of this union needs to be thought out.  While some of its proposals are probably far fetched, does it do any harm to look over the possibility.  I think not.

YouTube - Ron Paul @ CNN Republican Debate PT.1 11-28-07

YouTube LinkRon Paul did an excellent job of framing the argument on the North American Union.  He explained it as a contest of ideas.  It is a contest of Globalism vs. National Sovereignty.  The idea needs to be seriously discussed.  As one of the most important steps this country could ever take, our citizens should be part of the discussion.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

NAFTA and North Carolina's Right to Work Laws





Be on guard for drift in the official legal status of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (
SPP) signed by President Bush in March of 2005.  Considering the Supreme Court rulings to date, t
he SPP (or a successor) becoming a formal executive agreement under the pre-existing NAFTA umbrella could take take the process outside the scope of Congressional contro




This article explains how a group of unions have challenged North Carolina's right to work laws.


                   


In October, a coalition of US, Mexican and Canadian labor unions filed a complaint in a NAFTA created tribunal charging that the United States is in violation of its NAFTA obligations.  The charge is based on the fact that North Carolina maintains right-to-work laws against collective bargaining, which are in violation of the standards issued by the United Nation's International Labour Organization (ILO).   





This seems to be a completely different way of doing business in the United States.  It gives the President power to intervene in places where he could not previously and it gives rights to foreign organizations that surely had no rights before. 


This case will provide a practicle demonstration of the use of the NAFTA Tribunal as a court with more power on some issues than the Supreme Court itself. 


Tags: , , , ,


Link



Powered by Qumana


Thursday, November 1, 2007

America Under Siege, The North American Union: Chinese Investments in Mexican Ports

America Under Siege, The North American Union: Chinese Investments in Mexican Ports

This article gives extensive background on the NAFTA Superhighway and trade with China. It is essential reading when thinking about the possibility of NAU.

Two Day Time Saving for freight from Lazaro Cardenas to San Antonio compared to LA to San Antonio




Also part of Mexico’s multi-modal corridor strategy, in January the first international in-bond double stack
container test shipment between Kansas City Southern Railway and Kansas City Southern de Mexico was
reported. The container shipments from China were transported by rail from the Port of Lazaro Cardenas to
San Antonio Texas. The trip was two days faster than the best times through the Port of LA/Long Beach
(Source: Larry W. Grant, KCS News, January 20, 2006).





The time savings reported here puts the stamp of reality on these shipping proposals.  The lower wages in Mexico and the use of Mexican truckers would probably blow the shipping cost right out of the water.  I don.t think it is wise to call this part of a conspiracy theory.


Link


Tags: , , , ,



Powered by Qumana


The CANAMEX Trade Corridor


The CANAMEX Trade Corridor, as defined by Congress in the 1995 National Highway Systems Designation Act, is a High Priority Corridor.


(from Public Law 104-59, November 28, 1995)



(26) The CANAMEX Corridor from Nogales, Arizona, through Las Vegas, Nevada, to Salt Lake City, Utah, to Idaho Falls, Idaho, to Montana, to the Canadian Border as follows:


(A) In the State of Arizona, the CANAMEX Corridor shall generally follow-- (i) I-19 from Nogales to Tucson; (ii) I-10 from Tucson to Phoenix; and (iii) United States Route 93 in the vicinity of Phoenix to the Nevada Border.


(B) In the State of Nevada, the CANAMEX Corridor shall follow-- (i) United States Route 93 from the Arizona Border to Las Vegas; and (ii) I-15 from Las Vegas to the Utah Border.


(C) From the Utah Border through Montana to the Canadian Border, the CANAMEX Corridor shall




This site defines the changes needed to communication, transportation and information systems and the plans to do them in five western states.  This corridor is west of the Trans Texas Corridor.  It gives a view of another aspect of the massive changes planned for the United States, Mexico, and Canada with the advent of all these trade corridors. 
Link

Tags: , ,


Powered by Qumana


Who is Robert Pastor?


To most people who know him, Robert A. Pastor is a distinguished professor of international relations at American University, a long-time foreign policy adviser to Democratic presidents and candidates, the author or editor of 16 books, and the director of the Center for North American Studies. But to a rapidly growing number of people on the extreme right, this lifelong scholar is a "globalization pimp," one of the "traitors" trying to "effectively destroy the United States of America," a man, in the angry summation of far-right attack dog Jerome Corsi, who is the "father of the North American Union." What has Pastor done to deserve the opprobrium? He wrote a 2001 book on building a North American community, co-chaired a 2005 tri-national task force that produced a similar document, and had some of his ideas incorporated into the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" (SPP) announced by the U.S., Canada and Mexico on March 23, 2005. Although he has never come close to proposing that the three countries merge, that is the accusation now being touted by the radical right — and touted so effectively that the houses of representatives of at least 18 states have passed resolutions denouncing the SPP and what they characterize as a planned "North American Union."


In fact, Pastor has never advocated more than a "community" of the three countries — essentially, a closer relationship among the three governments — and the SPP has produced little of substance. The Intelligence Report interviewed Pastor about his ideas and their misinterpretation.

Tags: ,
Link

           


Powered by Qumana


Robert Pastor and the Birth of the Amero



INTELLIGENCE REPORT The nativists also charge you with promoting a North American currency to be called the "Amero." Is that so?
PASTOR I borrowed that idea from a Canadian economist called H. G. Grubel. But I just put his idea on the table for discussion, along with other options. The problem is that the right-wing attacks have made people so fearful they don't even want to open a discussion.


As economies become more integrated, the cost of changing money and of anticipating sharp changes in the exchange rate become a burden on the economies. That is why Europe moved to a single currency. A few economists have begun to raise the question as to what can be learned from Europe's rocky road to a single currency that might be helpful in thinking about the economic future of North America. These are complicated issues that will take time to study. The problem is that these vicious, know-nothing attacks have stifled research and debate.





Pastor's ideas should be honestly considered.  The NAU or anything like it is not to be entered into lightly, nor should it be rejected out of hand.  It might make many lives better.  But,  it must be discussed openly and all participants given a chance to examine the proposal. 



Link


Tags: , , ,


Powered by Qumana