Congressional Bill Opposing NAU and NAFTA Super Highway

H. Con. Res. 40: Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada
Link

The Trans-Texas Corridor and Water

Multi-modal corridors and water pipelines

The Trans Texas Corridor has been called “the largest engineering project ever proposed” for George Bush’s home
state. At its widest, the “multi-modal” transit corridor will be four football fields wide and include lanes for cars, trains
and trucks headed from the Mexican coast through Texas and into America’s heartland. But the track doesn’t end
there. Through public-private consortia like the North American Super Corridor Coalition, which counts the province
of Manitoba as a proud participant, plans are underway to extend this Texas pet-project right up past the Canadian
border to an expanded port in Churchill.
This proposed mega-highway has been dubbed the “NAFTA Superhighway” because it is designed to speed up the
flow of goods between the three signatory countries. But “multimodal” doesn’t just mean train, truck and car lanes. It
also means pipelines.
“Texas proposes to build a new type of transportation system, a network of wide corridors designed to move people
and goods faster and more safely than ever before,” says a Trans Texas Corridor Document from 2002. “Beyond that,
the corridor will feature a wide utility zone for the transmission of oil, natural gas, electricity, data and a substance
critical to the future of the state – water.”
Opponents of the corridor plan in Texas worry the pipelines will be used to carry Texan water south to Mexico in return
for oil. But considering the looming crisis in Texas, and the fact that bulk water exports are now being discussed as
part of the North American Future 2025 Project for continental integration, it is possible that the pipelines will be used
to carry Canadian water. “A lot of people don’t need it, but when you head south and west, we need it,” said George
W. Bush, six months into his term, at a joint press conference with former prime minister Jean Chrétien. “Some have
suggested abandoned pipelines that used to carry energy. That’s a possibility. I would be open to any discussion.

Links

Tags: Trans-Texas Corridor, Water, SPP, Trans Texas Corridor, North American Future 2025

Powered by Qumana

Why NAU might need to consider Mexican Identity

Powered by Qumana

This video shows an attitude that will not build a conbined North American identity. It shows a tremendous problem with racism.

Tags: Aztlan, Nafta, NAU, Immigration

Robert Pastor Proposes the Amero as a North American Currency

The most interesting surveys, however, show that a majority of the public in all three countries is prepared to join a larger North American country if they thought it would improve their standard of living and environment and not threaten their culture. Mexicans and Canadians do not want to be incorporated into the United States, and they are ambivalent about adopting the American dollar, but they are more willing to become part of a single country of North America and of a unified currency, like the “Amero,” proposed by Herbert Grubel. 2 The “Amero” would be equivalent of
the American dollar, and the two other currencies would be exchanged at the rate in which they are then traded for the U.S. dollar. In other words, at the outset, the wealth of all three countries would be unchanged, and the power to manage the currency would be roughly proportional to the existing wealth. The three governments’ remain zealous defenders of an aging conception of sovereignty whereas the people seem ready to entertain new approaches.

2 Herbert Grubel, The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union (Vancouver: Simon Fraser Institute, 1999). An October 2001 survey in Canada found that 55% favored the same currency as the United States, but 59% opposed adopting the U.S. dollar. See Allison Dunfield, "Canadians Feel Closer to the U.S., but Reject Currency," Globe and Mail, November 6, 2001

Link

Tags: Amero, Herbert Grubel, Pastor, Robert Pastor, NAU, NAFTA

Powered by Qumana

Robert Pastor and Lou Dobbs

Powered by Qumana

Robert Pastor's interview with Lou Dobbs gives more insight into the North American Union,.

Tags: robert Pastor, Lou Dobbs

Robert A. Pastor's article in Foreign Affairs

NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America. It was a deliberately lean document, intended only to dismantle barriers to trade and investment. Its architects planned neither for its success nor for the crises that would confront it. Although NAFTA fueled the train of continental integration, it did not provide conductors to guide it. As a result, two setbacks -- the Mexican peso crisis of 1995 and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 -- have threatened to derail the integration experiment.

The is nothing like these articles from the Council on Foreign Relations to convince someone that statements about the NAU being an imaginary conspiracy are misleading to say the least.  The US Federal Government seems to be working to keep the common person out of the discussion.  It is an interesting possibility and warrents consideration.  It's really hard to believe that it isn't getting consideration at the highest levels. 
Link

Tags: Robert A. Pastor, Pastor, NAFTA, Foreign Affairs, CFR, Council on Foreign Relations, NAU, North American Union

Powered by Qumana

Lou Dobbs, Ron Poul and the SPP

Lou Dobbs of CNN has been calling for a federal investigation of the North American Union for quite some time. And Earlier this year, Presidential candidate, and Texas Congressman, Ron Paul, weighed in on the issue when describing wording about accelerating the North American Union in legislation proposing illegal alien amnesty. Paul said:

“There are many other very troubling items buried deep in the Senate’s immigration compromise. The bill explicitly calls for an “acceleration” of the March 2005 agreement between the US president, the president of Mexico , and the prime minister of Canada , known as the “Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America .” This somewhat secretive agreement – a treaty in all but name – aims to erase the borders between the United States, Canada, and Mexico and threatens our sovereignty and national security. The SPP was agreed by the president without the participation of Congress. It should be eliminated, not accelerated! (Note: Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter have also opposed a North American Union)

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America  claims to be an innocent arrangement but as Paul pointed out it is illegal and wasn't approved by Congress.

Tags: SPP, NAU, Lou Dobbs, Ron Paul. North American Union

Link

Powered by Qumana

NASCO and its goalsLin

For more than 12 years North America’s SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO) and its members have
stood at the forefront of driving public and private sectors to unite to address strategically critical
national and international trade, transportation, security and environmental issues.
Our focus is on maximizing the efficiency of our existing transportation infrastructure to support
international trade. We recognize the extraordinary implications for our nation’s long-term economic
prosperity of our transport system’s ability to sustain that growth.
NASCO, a non-profit group initially founded in 1994 as the I-35 Corridor Coalition, represents
member cities, counties, states, provinces and private sector members devoted to maximizing the
efficiency and operations of the existing U.S. Interstate Highways 35/29/94 (the NASCO
SuperCorridor) and the intermodal inland ports NASCO has inspired to sprout along them. Never
have our efforts been more needed or been more urgent.
As the demand for freight transportation grows, so will its overall contribution to the nation’s economy
and its challenges to highway capacity, congestion and the local environments. In 1970, international
trade represented just 12 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). By 2000, trade surged to
25% of U.S. GDP. U.S. economists, however, expect trade to leap to 35% or more of U.S. GDP by
2020.
From almost immediately after the Jan. 1, 1994 entry into effect of the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA), NASCO has sought out and backed Corridor-related initiatives to
enhance border security, safety and the operational efficiency of the existing transportation
infrastructure. NAFTA’s reduction of import tariffs and trade barriers in North America powerfully
stimulated trade that strengthened the economies of its partner nations. Rather than the great fears of
NORTH AMERICA’S SUPERCORRIDOR COALITION, INC.
901 Main Street / Suite 4400 / Dallas, Texas 75202
(214) 744-1006 / Fax (214) 744-1043 / www.nascocorridor.com
NAFTA job losses of 1994, today, in the U.S. and in NASCO Corridor states, net job creation and net
employment have grown to and stayed at or near historical highs.
Since NAFTA took effect, total U.S. employment grew to 136 million, up from 112 million then,
with U.S. unemployment dropping to today’s 4.5 percent of the work force (a five-year low),
from 6.6 percent then out of work, according to U.S. Department of Labor statistics for the
period.
NASCO uses the term "SuperCorridor" to demonstrate we are more than just a highway
coalition. NASCO works to develop key relationships along the EXISTING corridors we
represent to maximize economic development opportunities for all affected by the flows.
NASCO’s reach helps coordinate the development of technology integration projects, inland
ports, environmental initiatives, university research, and the sharing of "best practices" across
North America. NASCO’s forte is in spurring coordination of efforts by local, state and federal
agencies and the private sector to integrate and secure a multimodal transportation system along
the existing NASCO Corridor.
As of late, there have been many media references to a "new, proposed NAFTA Superhighway.”
While NASCO and the cities, counties, states and provinces along our existing Interstate
Highways 35/29/94 (the NASCO Corridor) have referred for years to I-35 and key branches as
'the NAFTA Superhighway,' the reference solely acknowledged and recognized I-35’s major role
in carrying a remarkable portion of international trade with Mexico, the United States and
Canada. In actual fact, there are no plans to build “a new NAFTA Superhighway.” It already
exists today as I-35 and branches.
A decade ago, NAFTA captured the headlines of international trade. But today international trade is
global trade. It requires even bolder and more aggressive efforts by our organization and our leaders to
meet the challenges and to extract maximum economic benefit for our people from exploding global
trade.
For more than a decade, NASCO has encouraged the boldest thinking on adoption of trade processing
systems, logistics systems and information technology. Eighty percent of NASCO members have 10
years of active service.
The subject of trade and transportation is much too important to leave to the uninformed. Here
are the REAL facts:
In the 21st century, the U.S economy increasingly runs on trade and our trade runs on
transportation. Trade and the transportation facilities that sustain it are tied together. Future
economic growth and job creation in the U.S. require a constant effort to enhance our business
climate, environment and transportation infrastructure to sustain our world-class leadership in
world trade.
NASCO’s aim is to continuously, diligently upgrade the efficiency and security of our
transportation systems to sharply increase the efficiency of our transportation infrastructure on
the Corridor to drive down the cost of doing business and enhance our ability to do internationa

Obviously, NASCO is a group that needs to be on the radar.  It has plans that affect the midwest and yet we have no appreciation of them.

Tags: NASCO, Nafta super highway, spp, nau

Link

Powered by Qumana

Meeting on the Trans Texas Corridor

By Terri Hall - T.U.R.F. - Wednesday, 10 October 2007

In this article, Transportation Commissioner Ted Houghton repeatedly refers to Texans' FREEways as "assets" as if the PUBLIC'S highways are theirs to sell to the highest bidder on Wall Street! To make matters worse, they're holding a SECRET, CLOSED DOOR meeting to discuss the next controversial leg of the Trans Texas Corridor, TTC 69. Also noteworthy, businesses, ie - the Chamber of Commerce, are invited to the table, but NOT the taxpaying public whose community will be paved over by this corridor! How is this getting "community feedback?" Secrecy and involving multi-national corporations has become standard operating procedure for these trade corridors.

TURF's Board member, Hank Gilbert, is mentioned in the article.

Link

This article gives more information on the Trans Texas Corridor.

Powered by Qumana

Grass Roots Response to the Trans Texas Corridor

TxDOT coached on thwarting toll foes on talk radio

Peggy Fikac - Express- News Austin bureau AUSTIN — 10/17/2007
When Texas transportation officials talk about bridges these days, they don't necessarily mean steel spans and concrete girders. Instead, they are being taught how to "bridge" from off-message questions to their own talking points in a toll-road campaign.
"You will often be asked questions that don't get to the points you wish to make or that you don't wish to answer," says a "radio interview techniques" section of Texas Department of Transportation documents released under the Public Information Act. "You can use bridging to turn the question to your points."

One useful phrase, suggests the document — prepared by consultants who are to be paid $24,500 for talk-radio training for the campaign, and tweaked by the department — is this: "I think what you are really asking is ..."

The document also offers this timeless advice: "Keep calm. Leave wrestling to the pigs. They always end up looking like pigs."

The training document is part of the multimillion-dollar Keep Texas Moving campaign, the subject of a court hearing today.

The hearing comes after activist Terri Hall of the San Antonio Toll Party and Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom filed a court petition to stop the agency from spending public funds on the campaign, projected to cost $7 million to $9 million in highway money.

Hall also wants to block any lobbying attempts by transportation officials to persuade Congress to allow more toll roads.

The Keep Texas Moving campaign has a focus on toll roads and the Trans-Texas Corridor network. Both are touted by GOP Gov. Rick Perry and others as necessary in the face of congestion and gas-tax revenues that fall short of meeting road needs. Criticism has centered on the potential corridor route and on the state partnering with private firms to run toll roads.

In her court filing, Hall contends that transportation officials, in promoting the initiatives, are violating a ban on lobbying and on using their authority for political purposes.

The state says TxDOT is allowed by law to promote toll projects and that its campaign is a response to a call from the public and from elected officials for more information on road initiatives.

State District Judge Orlinda Naranjo of Travis County last month refused to order an immediate stop to the spending. Naranjo today will consider a state request that she dismiss the case.

The state contends the legal complaint is moot because an existing contract for media services was due to end Sept. 30.

Thompson Marketing of San Antonio got a state contract of nearly $2 million last year for the first phase of the project, which included a marketing development plan and such items as TV and radio spots, print ads, internet banner ads and billboards.

The company billed the agency in March regarding a Senate transportation hearing and in April and May for "legislature, media monitoring for strategic planning, messaging." Lawmakers this year worked to curb new private toll projects.

The state plans no more spending on "any future media placement under the current Keep Texas Moving campaign" but still needs to pay Thompson Marketing for some previous work, said an affidavit by Helen Havelka, the campaign's manager.

The agency also has a $20,000 contract for talk-radio training for transportation officials with the Rodman Co., which subcontracted with ViaNovo, whose team includes former Bush strategist Matthew Dowd. It plans another $4,500 training class, and the two consulting companies plan two telephone town-hall meetings at a cost of $17,480.

Rodman and ViaNovo worked on the radio training guide, said TxDOT spokesman Chris Lippincott, who also had input on the document, titled "Talking on Talk Radio."

"The talk radio environment runs the gamut from productive and thoughtful to vitriolic and silly," Lippincott said. "We certainly want to prepare (agency spokespeople) for all possibilities, and that includes everyone from a skeptical talk-show host to an outright hostile caller."
Read more in the San Antonio Express News

       

Link

Tags: Toll Roads, TTC, Trans-Texas Corridor

Powered by Qumana

Common Terms used in the NAU Debate

Let me define these terms:

· NAFTA Super Highway: A Super Highway to be built from Mexico through the US and Canada.

· NAU: (North American Union) The union of Mexico, The United States and Canada.

· The North American Free Trade Agreement: Under this agreement, the creation and expansion of the NAU may be enacted to build a political and economic entity without congressional supervision and consent.

· Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC): A highway system connecting the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

· North American Court of Justice: A court that would have the power to overrule decisions of the United Sates Supreme Court.

· North American Trade Tribunal: An independent quasi-judicial body that can carry out statutory tasks in a sovereign and neutral manner.

· North American Parliament: A national representative body having supreme legislative powers within the NAU.

Link

Tags: NAFTA, NAU, TTC, Trans-Texas Corridor, North American Court of Justice, North American Trade Tribunal, North American Parliament

I plan to find out about the North American Court of Justice, the North American Trade Tribunal and the North American Parliament since I know little about them currently.  The others I  have followed for some time now.

Powered by Qumana

So Fred Thompson hasn't heard of the North American Union-can't read much.

Link

Tags: Fred Thompson, NAU, North American Union, Houston, NAFTA, SPP, CFA, Council on Foreign Relations

You get to meet an awful lot of interesting people in this video.  You also get to hear Fred Thompson say he never heard of the North American Union.  Well, whether he is for it or against it, he should have heard of it.  Watch the video and you will have heard a lot more about it too.

Another Link

Powered by Qumana

Phyllis Schlafly has a common concern with me!!! WHAAA

Phyllis Schlafly, who has been fighting feminism and liberalism for decades, still appears on 460 radio stations daily.

She said the top tier Republicans show little compassion for people who have lost their jobs to globalism.

That was a segue into national sovereignty. Schlafly is still smarting over President Bush’s dismissal of the right-wing fear that he is secretly plotting to create a North American union that would essentially merge Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. And her candidate must oppose any and all U.N. treaties.

Phyllis and I agree on one thing.  Don't trust the administration and pay attention to whatever they are doing in the SPP.  The word needs to get out on this broader version of NAFTA, this version with common borders, and a body that is superior to any existing in the U.S. government.  Broad discussion is needed.  Some of that discussion should include common people in Mexico and Canada who will be greatly affected as well.

Link

Tags: NAU, SPP, George W. Bush, NAFTA, Phyllis Schlafly

Powered by Qumana

Will 'Corporate Democrates' run the country?

Democrat John Edwards blamed Bill Clinton's administration Saturday for trade agreements unpopular with labor unions and warned against electing "corporate Democrats."

Edwards described the North American Free Trade Agreement as a blow to the middle class that President Clinton put in place while the first lady was failing in her mission to reform health care.

"I think we've been asking the wrong questions about these proposed trade deals," he added. "The question seems to have been, 'Is this trade deal good for the profits of big multinational corporations?'"

The former North Carolina senator says he would renegotiate the 1993 deal that lowered trade barriers among the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

New York Sen. Clinton said recently that trade agreements, including NAFTA, should be reviewed every five years to make sure "they're meeting their goals or to make adjustments if they are not."

Edwards described the stakes of the presidential race in stark terms, asking the crowd if they want to live in a country made up of "a few rich people and everybody else." He suggested his Democratic rivals would not serve the interests of workers.

"Do you want to trade a crowd of corporate Republicans that are running this country now for a crowd of corporate Democrats?" he asked. "That's not us."

    Edwards seems to be on the right track here but way behind the train.  The executive branch seems to have many people who are engaged in work that is just opposite of what he is proposing.  Corporate interests have a position thought out or at least developing and most common citizens can't tell you what SPP is. 

Link

Tags: Corporate Democrates, Edwards, Clinton, Hiliary Clinton, NAFTA, NAU, SPP

Powered by Qumana

Senetor Glenn McConnel asks for a constitutional convention on immigration

McConnell told ABC News 4 Charleston "I heard somebody on the radio station this morning saying we were dragging our feet in Columbia and that there was a federal law that says we could turn them over to the Feds. Well, what they don't understand is that the Feds never come to get them and there's nothing you can do,"

McConnell complained to ABC that the federal won’t enforce the laws or respond when asked to do so.

Recently former Mexican President Vincente Fox, while advocating erasing borders between the U.S. and Mexico on Comedy Central and Larry King Live, admitted to supporting a North American Union and implicated President Bush in plot to create a regional currency as well.

Tags: Senetor Glenn McConnell, NAU, North American Union, SPP

Tags: Constitutional Convention

Link

This is another link to information about the activities of the Federal Government on this issue. 

Powered by Qumana

Naomi Wolf and the Ten Steps to Crush Democracy

Letter to Senator Carl Levin

I've included the letter that I sent to Senator Levin on the SPP.  I really believe that a grass roots effort to understand this proposed union of Canada, Mexico, and the United States is essential to pursueing the issue.  Hopefully, our congress can provide guidance on this issue.

Comments: I am extremely interested in the activities of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. The executive branch seems to be engaged in forging relationships with Canada and Mexico without proper oversight from Congress and without the knowledge of the American people. While it is too early for me to form an opinion on the value of the SPP's efforts, it is not too early for me to question the misleading information being put out by the executive branch. The SPP seems to be part of the potential integration of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. All three societies need clear information on this plan and a chance to evaluate the good and evil of the action. The Trans-Texas Corridor is a very important piece of this effort. The people of Michigan need to understand this massive effort in Texas since it appears that a private, foreign company is constructing this massive conduit for men, material and information. That company has a fifty year non-compete clause that Texas seems to have agreed to. The result will be Michigan trade being affected by the goals of a foreign company's deal with the State of Texas. Senator Levin, I would really appreciate knowing that the legistlative branch is on top of this situation but I greatly fear that it is not. I know that the people in this part of Michigan have no clue about the SPP and the possible North American Union that could come from it. Senator, you have been in the forefront of dealing with this executive branch in all its recent behavior. I certainly hope you can give guidance in how to interpret the actions of the SPP. Thank you

Tags: Senator Levin, SPP, North American Union, Mexico, Canada, United States, Trans Texas Corridor

Powered by Qumana

Dr. Jerome Corsi and the NAU

This video gives information on the SPP and the North American Union. Much can be learned from its point of view.

Tags: Dr. Jerome Corsi, NAU, NAFTA, SPP, Trans-Texas Corridor

Canadians Protest the SPP

The North American Union needs a great deal of explaination. Explaination that seems to not be desired by the government of the United States. The concerns the Canadians voice in this video are relevant here. Their complaints about the lack of transparency are relevant too.

Evolution by Stealth

A hush-hush meeting held in Banff, Canada, last year seriously explored the issue of how to sneak (yes, that is the right word) — sneak a North American Union (NAU) onto the people of the U.S. Canada, and Mexico. What we are talking about is making a de facto merger of the three countries a fait accompli by the time it's too late to reverse it.

What else can one believe when the term "evolution by stealth" is used? (For background on the NAU, see this column Illegal Aliens and the Secret Monster Highway (Oct. 9, 2006) and AIM Report America's Borders: Going-Going-Gone! (Dec. 22, 2006).

Tags: Evolution by Stealth, SPP, Baniff Meeting, NAU, North American Union, Trans Texas Corridor, Judicial Watch

                    Link

This article gives more information on all the players and programs of the SPP. 

Powered by Qumana

Powered by Qumana

Judicial Watch and the SPP

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, concerning the agency’s involvement with the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

A 10-page partnership “Work Plan for the Financial Services Working Group” is included (somewhat incongruously) among the Health and Human Service records.  The “work plan” details 24 specific “deliverables” by officials from the U.S. Treasury, Finance Canada, BANXICO, the Federal Reserve Board – Atlanta, and regulatory agencies from all three countries.  The deliverables include “cross-border” cooperation in the areas of car insurance, Social Security totalization for Mexico, banking, and Federal Reserve’s “Directo a Mexico” remittance program.

Among the specific deliverables outlined in the “work plan” is a taxpayer-supported program to improve Mexico’s infrastructure:  “Improve North America’s competitiveness by enhancing Mexico’s competitive position through the establishment of a grant fund for development with U.S. and Canadian resources to finance the development of physical infrastructure in Mexico.”  The objective has a timeline for completion of 6-18 months.

“If U.S. tax dollars are going to be used to fund Mexico’s economic development, the American people ought to know about it,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “Judicial Watch remains committed to ensuring that this process is open and transparent.”

This grant process is amazing at a time when U.S. infrastructure is failing we seem to be footing the bill of work in Mexico.  Further research on this is needed. 

Tags: Mexican Grants, Infrastructure, SPP

Powered by Qumana

One World Government-an Extreme View

This does sound like a grand conspiracy theory. It does have some interesting ideas and graphics though so I include it here.

President Vincente Fox discusses a common Currency

So Bush says that no discussions were held, that the whole NAU thing is rediculous. President Fox doesn't seem to have that impression

The Militarization and Annexation of North America

Besides the Bush administration's imperial aims and permanent war on the world, add the one at home below the radar. Its weapons include the WTO, NAFTA, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FBI, CIA, NSA, NORTHCOM, militarized state and local police, National Guard forces, paramilitary mercenaries like Blackwater USA, and all other repressive instruments of state power and control. They target the people of three nations slowly becoming one headquartered in Washington. That's the apparent aim of those in power here wanting one continent, "indivisible" minus old-fashioned ideas like "liberty and justice for all" we used to believe in when, as kids, we recited our "Pledge of Allegiance." They now have a whole new meaning. They're just words drummed into young minds hoping they'll still believe them when they're old enough to know better.

This is an article that goes into the North American Union much deeper than normal. It is quite deep mentionning names and organizations that I have not heard of before. This requires further study.

Media and the NAU

We can't know too much about this process. It would be the biggest thing since the founding of the Republic and is not well KNOWN. That is amazing.

Globalization and the North American Union