Friday, January 25, 2008

NewsDaily: TopNews -- Wolfowitz rejoins Bush administration

 

Former Pentagon second-in-command and World Bank chief Paul Wolfowitz has returned to the Bush administration as an adviser in the U.S. State Department.

Wolfowitz was appointed chairman of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's International Security Advisory Board, a position formerly held by Fred Thompson, a former candidate for the Republican presidential nomination who dropped out of the race Tuesday, The New York Times reported Friday.

The former head of the World Bank, who also serves as a visiting scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute think tank, will head the board, which meets four times a year to advise the secretary on foreign policy issues, including Iran and North Korea, using classified intelligence.

Wolfowitz, considered one of the top architects of the war in Iraq, has been involved in arms control issues since the 1970s.

NewsDaily: TopNews -- Wolfowitz rejoins Bush administration

 

Here's news for Wolfowitz rejoining the administration.  The same names just keep turning up.  This one has lots of political baggage.  I have to wonder why we are still dealing with him.

 

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Marketplace: Why not a North American Union?

What is there to fear?  The speaker compares Mexican workers coming into the United States to Polish workers coming into Britain based on the ave. GDP.  I afraid he misses the point of what  a migration of several million people might do to American culture.  Mexico would never be the same either.  I'm sixty-two and love Mexico.  Mexico could become the new Florida.  It is good to  see someone talking up the idea of a union though.

Marketplace: Why not a North American Union?

Floating stability

This article goes into the advantages for Canada of a unified North American currency.  It also makes the idea sound more legitimate.

Now, a full North American monetary union supported by a high degree of goods and labor market integration would mitigate many of these problems, but these are unrealistic goals at a time when even progress with the Prosperity and Security Partnership is stalled. Canada's current choice is between the status quo -- stable domestic inflation supported by a floating exchange rate -- and a pegged rate accompanied by greater domestic instability that would itself tend to undermine the very regime producing it.

The status quo thus remains Canada's better option. We should face this fact and get on with policies that will make it easier to cope with continuing pressures from world commodity markets. Progress in creating a single domestic market for goods and labor, reducing disincentives to investment in manufacturing and elsewhere, and enhancing the labor force's skills and flexibility, will require hard work and take time. Unlike a quick exchange rate fix, however, it would actually help matters.

--- - David Laidler is a Fellow-in-Residence at the C.D. Howe Institute and Professor Emeritus, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario.

Floating stability

Rebuttal - Snopes Article Concerning the NAU « Lighthouse Patriot Journal

Rebuttal - Snopes Article Concerning the NAU « Lighthouse Patriot Journal

This article has many links to material dealing with the North American Union. It also summarizes criticism of the idea that NAU is a reality. It's worth going over.

North-American Monetary Integration: Here Comes the Amero

 

The introduction of the Amero is an integral aspect of the process of creating a North American Union, much like the European Union. This process is being undertaken through the implementation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which was signed by the leaders of the three North American governments in March of 2005. This agreement is orchestrating the bureaucratic “harmonization” among the three North American nations to pave the way for a North American Community, akin to the previous European Community, and ultimately, a North American Union.

The push for this agenda is being driven by the US-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the preeminent American think tank, and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, as well as the Mexican equivalent, Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales. In May of 2005, the three groups, as a result of their joining forces in a Task Force, released a report entitled, “Building a North American Community,” in which they state that, “The Task Force offers a detailed and ambitious set of proposals that build on the recommendations adopted by the three governments at the Texas summit of March 2005. The Task Force’s central recommendation is establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff, and an outer security perimeter.”10

In November of 2007, the Globe and Mail reported that, “Canada should replace its dollar with a North American currency, or peg it to the U.S. greenback, to avoid the exchange rate shifts the loonie has experienced, renowned money manager Stephen Jarislowsky told a parliamentary committee yesterday,” and quoted Jarislowsky as saying, “I think we have to really seriously start thinking of the model of a continental currency just like Europe.”17 The article continued, “Mr. Jarislowsky, a former Canfor Corp. director, said the loonie's rise to above par with the U.S. dollar is destroying manufacturing and could devastate the forest sector,” and that, “Mr. Jarislowsky said Canada could either aim for a common North American currency or peg the loonie to the U.S. greenback at about 80 cents (U.S.), allowing it to float within a small band.” Jarislowsky, a billionaire often considered to be Canada’s Warren Buffet, is a member of several corporate boards, and is also a member of the board of directors of the C.D. Howe Institute.18 Appearing on Larry King Live recently, former Mexican President and initial signatory to the Security and Prosperity Partnership, Vicente Fox, when asked a question about whether or not it was possible to see a common currency for Latin America, responded by stating, “Long term, very long term. What we propose together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all of the Americas. And everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came. He decided to isolate himself. He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea,” to which Larry King interjected, “It's going to be like the euro dollar, you mean?” and Fox responded, “Well, that would be long, long term. I think the processes to go, first step into is trading agreement. And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA.”19 So clearly, there is a move on toward a regional currency for North America, in conjunction with the formation of a North American Union. Monetary sovereignty, and especially the power to create and issue money, is perhaps more central to the idea of a free, democratic and sovereign nation than the right to vote. If we do not have the power over the issuance of money, it does not matter whom we vote for. It’s the Golden Rule: he who has the gold, makes the rules. We, as Canadians, and other peoples of their respective nations should never relinquish this sovereignty over to regional boards, private banks, or other unaccountable individuals. It is our right, not a privilege, and giving up such a right is akin to giving up the right to vote; it is anathema to democracy and a free society.

North-American Monetary Integration: Here Comes the Amero

 

Technorati Tags: ,,